De Francism

From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

"To save the borders, the best saints are the cannons."

De Francism is an authoritarian, economically left-wing, and extremely culturally progressive ideology inhabiting the top left corner of the political compass. He believes in a utopian society based around the teachings in Rousseau's The Social Contract. He is selectively elitist, anti-colonialist, and anti-clericalist. This manifests in somewhat needlessly authoritarian decrees. For instance, he forbade the elite from marrying within their own race, so they were forced to marry common folk. Some draw comparisons between De Francism and Jacobinism because of their mutual radical dislike of elites and shared authoritarian tendencies. Though De Francism took away many individual freedoms and squashed dissent, it was still beloved by the people of Paraguay. De Francist foreign policy is mostly isolationist, though he will make alliances with neighbors to protect himself. He also really likes hats for some reason.

Compared to most South American autocratic ideologies, De Francism was the most culturally liberal, and incorporated populist policies. Though the right wing parties despised De Francism, it was praised by the left wing parties. After the death of José de Francia, De Francism mostly died off. Though most remember De Francism for it's isolationist foreign policy, it helped solidify Paraguay's place in the world as a legitimate nation and helped bring progressive ideals and values to South America.

History

Beliefs

Francia aimed to found a society on the principles of Rousseau's Social Contract and was also inspired by Robespierre and Napoleon. To create such a utopia, he imposed a ruthless isolation upon Paraguay, interdicting all external trade, and he fostered national industries.

Francia in some ways resembles the caudillos of the post-colonial era, but he deviated from the elitist tendencies of most of his contemporaries. Instead, he attempted to reorganize Paraguay in accordance with the wishes of the lower classes and other marginalized groups. He greatly limited the power of the Church and the landed elites in favor of giving peasants a way to make a living on state-run estancias. He is criticized by some scholars for being entirely against the Church, he wanted only to diminish the institution's all-encompassing political control. He actually built new churches and supported religious festivals using state funds. Francia's government also took over services usually under church supervision, such as orphanages, hospitals, and homeless shelters, to manage them more efficiently. Francia and his policies were in fact very well received by the majority of Paraguayans, excluding the small ruling classes, and his neutrality in foreign affairs kept peace in a period of turmoil.


Francia's authoritarian regime built the foundations of a strong and dirigiste state in order to undertake the economic modernization of the country. Paraguay thus instituted rigorous protectionism at a time when most other countries were adopting the free-trade system promoted by the United Kingdom while entrusting their national bourgeoisie with the task of piloting wealth creation. This model, continued after Francia's death by his successors Carlos Antonio López and Francisco Solano López, made Paraguay one of the most modern and socially advanced countries in Latin America: the redistribution of wealth was so great that many foreign travelers reported that the country had no begging, hunger or conflict. The agrarian reform has allowed for a fairly equitable distribution of land. Asunción was one of the first capitals on the continent to inaugurate a railroad network. The country had a growing industry and a merchant fleet made up of ships built in national shipyards, had a trade surplus and was debt-free.

Personality

De Francism is violently opposed to Monarchism and Imperialism. He is often angry, especially at Authoritarian Right ideologies, though is somewhat tolerant of most other ones. Has no problem with being called a dictator. He is also extremely defensive of José de Francia, and likes to rant about Monarchy and Progressivism.

How to Draw

Flag of De Francism

Drawing De Francism is easy.

  1. Draw a ball
  2. Fill with light blue
  3. Draw a white hexagram in the top-right section of the ball (try to make it somewhat pointy)
  4. Draw the eyes, and then you're done!
Color NameHEXRGB
 Light Blue#75AADBrgb(117, 170, 219)
 White#FFFFFFrgb(255, 255, 255)


Relationships

Friends

Frenemies

  • Progressivism - You're cool, but you don't take things far enough.
  • Socialism - You're okay, but I don't know about all this "internationalism".
  • Marxism - Same as the above. Though I do wish you were born a little earlier - we could've teamed up!
  • Anarcho-Communism - You are technically my brother, but you are nonetheless a cringe anarchist.
  • Bonapartism - Too moderate economically and socially, but you are nonetheless an inspiration.
  • Bolivarianism - A fellow revolutionary for sure, but you are still too moderate. At least you influenced other South American leftists.
  • Cameralism - I am personally no monarchy fan, but apparently Solano López implemented you.
  • Jingoism - Isolationism rules! Solano López takes over DEATH TO ARGENTINA, BRAZIL AND URUGUAY!!!
  • Fascism - I hate your social policy but your economic ideas and police work are admirable.
  • Manosphere - You’re not right in the head. Even if you admire me, I want nothing to do with you, you hear!?
  • Falangism - I consider you an improvement over regular fascism because of the mandatory race-mixing, but you still have cringe social policy.
  • Kakistocracy - My policies were good in retrospect, but most people argue that Solano Lopez’s campaigns destroyed Paraguay.

Enemies

ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THIS HELL WAS ALREADY PRACTICED IN PARAGUAY!?

  • Nacionalismo - Shit ideology, go and mix with my Guarani people, NOW.
    • - SHUT YOUR MOUTH, BOLIGUAYO, I WILL NEVER WRECK MY EUROPEAN HERITAGE WITH THOSE SAVAGES.

Further Information

Literature

Wikipedia

Gallery

Navigation

  1. There is a debate in Latin American countries about his figure, some consider him a hero who defended Paraguay against its enemies and wanted to stop Brazilian imperialism, others consider him an insane dictator who led his country into a senseless war and caused the death of the majority of the population.