User talk:BookchinFan69420

Regional categories

Don't create regional categories or any other categories without moderator approval, we have had many votes and disucssions on these issues before, don't think you can just barge in and do what you want, I will let this one time slip but consider yourself warned. - TheGhostOfInky (talk) 08:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

On Kahanism and State Liberalism

Hey listen man. The only reason why I made Statlib have a positive relationship with Kahanism is that, despite being Reactionary, State Liberalism only likes them on the basis of being Zionist, as well as pointing out how they have Positive Relations with Reactionary Modernism And how they don’t really always stay true to their views on Cultural Leftism and all that. Also, I’m not doing it on the basis that I’m Antisemitic, and I think I should make that very clear.

State Liberalism is atheistic. Why would it have a positive relationship of Judaism? -User:FanOfWolves

User:AbsoluteInfinity - Hey man, thanks for replying, look, the reason why would have a positive relationship with Judaism has to do with how in the Talmud, it recognises their being more than 2 Genders, and you know how State Liberalism is right?; https://x.com/bronhaul1/status/1604827757447647233?s=46&t=eWEckz0qmEvdSB6mUiZvnA

Kamilazer - Kahanism is built upon ethnic exclusion and jewish primacy in mind which is against state liberalism which views the individual as the primary unit. Kahanism is also right wing or conservative ideology and rarely uses the more than two genders trope like jewish theocracy would. also state liberalism opposes theocracy or religion in government even if it is a pro lgbt one.

User:AbsoluteInfinity - Kamilazer. Has State Liberalism ever been the most true to there beliefs? As long as they support their views and agenda, then they support them. Like how Reactionary Modernism does.
TEB - Pretty sure State Liberalism would hate Kahanism unless they join forces to bomb Gaza, State Liberalism is a literal woke strawman.
User:AbsoluteInfinity - Come on! State Liberalism, even if it is woke to the core, is very contradictory at times!!!!!

Do you have reddit?

User:NR34 - Hey, do you have reddit? Btw, thanks for uploading my artwork.

Yeah, I do. You welcome. - User:FanOfWolves

User:NR34 - Nice to hear that.

Zionism Page(s)

User:FASTIN - I wanted to know if you could help me a bit with the Zionism page. Probably. FanOfWolves (talk) 00:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC) User:FASTIN - I have uploaded a bunch of Sam Aronow's videos there as a source, because he has the best series of videos on Jewish History on the Internet, but this was my first edit, and I am not sure if I have enough experience to summarize their content and write it on the page(s).

User:FASTIN - Why is Netanyahu in the Authoritarian Capitalism page ? I don't know any policies of his that would justify putting him next to Suharto and Batista, it's like putting George Bush there. (idk)

User:FASTIN - User:KamiLazer posted Leopold II apologia, and he added Balbo to the fascism page without mentioning the Libyan Genocide.

Nazism being (debatably) Fascist

Are you sure that Kami isn’t being somewhat biased when using a few certain sources to claim that Nazism isn’t Fascism? I’ve been having to try to talk him over it for more than a week and he keeps doubling down and acting like he has authority over everyone. I question some of the sources he uses that claim that Nazism developed separately from fascism, as though he may have some political bias involved in posting those sources. I mean, it should be well known that Nazism is an extreme form of Fascism that mixed national rebirth with scientific racism and social Darwinism, but Kami is like “No! They developed separately! They are not Fascists!” He sounds pretty arrogant, mean-spirited, and biased. He really thinks that Nazism being fascist is just “Allied propaganda.” You think he may be a Classical Fascist himself? Because it kinda sounds like it.WhiteTiger93 (talk)

Multiple sources say that Nazism is an extreme and racialist form of Fascism and a German brand of Fascism. Non-Nazi fascists may make an attempt to separate Fascism from Nazism due to the Holocaust among other things. Kami is probably a member of those groups of fascists. - FanOfWolves (talk) 23:49, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

I figured as much. Maybe you need to talk some sense to him about why Nazism is undoubtably Fascist as you probably know more about making a good debate than I do. Would really appreciate it. Thank you. WhiteTiger93 (talk

really bro you are doing this. "using a few certain sources" you mean the basis of studies for fascism itself being sternhell gregor morgan and stanley? And yes they developed separately as sternhell has shown through his work. and no I am not a classical fascist I just have read sternhell and gregor who show they arent the same and show the development of the movements. even looking at this page no one is consistent with using lower case f fascism and you expect us to use it as a taxon and category that you don't even adhere to while writing? the problem here is that you don't want to compromise and state the obvious that labeling the nazis as fascist is an academically debated subject.if you just admit this than this would all be over YOU DONT EVEN HAVE TO SAY THEY ARENT. I am giving you an out here bro. -kamilazer

On The Crossed-out section of ideologies

Listen man, I don’t get it, why do you think it’s unnecessary? Don’t you think it’s annoying when something like this is in the middle of an ideology?

It is very unnecessary to have a whole section for crossed out ideologies, and it ruins the joke of the crossed out ideologies even being there. - FanOfWolves (talk) 10:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Wdym? - AbsoluteInfinity 9:12 PM Eastern Australian Standard Time

The "crossed out" section is stupid and it ruins the whole joke of the crossed out ideologies being there in the first place. It's funny when it is in the middle of the ideology, and moving it to a whole different section ruins the joke and is also stupid and unnecessary. - FanOfWolves (talk) 11:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Full support to FanOfwolves making jokes(they are funny)- Kamilazer

Since Infinity is banned, you can make icons for me

Make an icon for this guy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Minadeo_II

Also, I've seen him wear glasses so add glasses. -DECB

Since Infinity is banned and blah blah blah

Make an icon for this guy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Arce

Also, I've seen him wear glasses so add glasses. And the base icon the same as Evismo but moderate, highlighting Arce's moderatism.

Update the Baumhammers icon

-DECB

No offense but you should add a bow to your female icons.

I had to change the Witzke and Rupnow icons. You forgot to add the bow and it is not that hard in my opinion. - User:Coco0330

On Putinism and State Liberalism

Putin is an Authoritarian and Capitalist ideology I'm not an ultra for saying that Second Thought also thinks the same thing. So why is it on the enemies list? And Statelib also supports Reactionary Modernism. - User:Coco0330

On the Albanian Socialist Party logo and Socialist International logo.

No offense but it's not even that bad I don't get why someone would hate it this much. And the new Socialist International logo looks way better. - User:Coco0330

Why do you seem to hate AbsoluteInfinity so much?

I don’t get it. He never seemed to have been a bad guy. Just someone who made some mistakes.

He was an annoying ass dude who had a weird obsession with pedophilia and sexual stuff. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

How was he annoying? Also i don’t think he was Pedophile, nor a gooner. But explain? - User:Somegyy

He kept:

• separating different variants into unnecessary different sections for ideologies that were crossed out.
• Commonly started edit wars (eg: Trying to deny that Trump is a Zionist, starting an edit war by adding PETER SCULLY as a variant)

- BookchinFan69420 (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Well on Trump, I don’t think he was necessarily denying it, rather just saying that Trump was more approving of a Two-State Solution. And on Scully, I don’t think AbsoluteInfinity was necessarily trivialising nor condoning and glorifying what he did. - User:Somegyy

Where did the Scullyism edit war happened? Just asking - Killer Kitty

It happened in September, and reignited in October when a discord mod tried to remove it. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Wait! Why are accusing me of being AbsoluteInfinity WTF???

Please explain yourself, I barely know you yet your being like this?

It's very simple:

You said that you MADE the variants when the correct terminology would be that you RESTORED them. Those are variants that ABSOLUTEINFINITY made. You went and restored the nonsense that AbsoluteInfinity added in the Oligarchy page, even though many people wanted that removed. You format your pages in the same way. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

That’s just because I’m new and stuff, and it is not because I’m AbsoluteInfinity. And why are you making him out to be this horrible user that terrorised the site and that nobody liked? - User:Somegyy

"That's just because I'm new and stuff" that's the dumbest fucking excuse that I've ever heard. That's NO way that that's a coincidence. You tried to add make the VERY same variants that were added by him. There's no way that that's a coincidence. Also, you guys talk in the exact same way. There's no way that these are just coincidences. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 15:08, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

I know how he talks in edit summaries because I've been in MANY edit wars with him before, like I mentioned previously. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Elaborate on how he talks please - User:Somegyy

With unnecessary capitalization. Can you perhaps explain why your pages are formatted in the same way and elaborate on why you tried to restore the variants of his that where removed. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Unnecessary Capitalization? I don’t capitalize unnecessarily. - User:Somegyy

"Guys, we have Communist Corporatism, a fantastic School of Thought that was removed, can someone please explain? - That's very similar to the way he used to talk. Also, if I hadn't mentioned AbsoluteInfinity in my summary, would you have still reverted my edit on the Manosphere page? Also, please elaborate and at least try to defend the similarities between your page and Absoluteinfinity's. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Hey dude, I wanna apologize for messing up the Religious Nationalism page, just wanted to keep things clean

I’m just a new user. That’s all - User:LibCon021209 5:09 AM, February 15, 2025 (UTC)

About Pol Pot

1- can you be more respectful? Honestly you sounds like a 13 years old tankie ( Im not saying you are) 2- Honestly I want know your vision why polpot isnt a imperialist(I also disagee about J.D vance but I will continue with you deciseon for now) he is a genocidal dictator than commited genocide against ethnic minorities and wanted recreate the Kambodja Empire, this isnt a challenge I just wanna know your opinion

Genodical≠imperialist - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes but he commited etnic cleashing to strengten his political power, he also wanted recreate the cambodja empire

Ethnic cleansing ≠ imperialism. Him wanting to establish an empire also needs a source. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 19:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

1 Yes, It is 2-https://suckhoedoisong.vn/neu-khong-co-bo-doi-tinh-nguyen-viet-nam-se-khong-co-dieu-ky-dieu-ay-1693535.htm, Philip (2004). Pol Pot: The History of a Nightmare. London: John Murray.The democratic kampucha atacked the vietnam first, for example, do you have any question?

Ethnic cleansing can be carried out without invading other countries. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 21:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

• You didn't talked about Pol Pot invasion of Vietnam and Pol Pot wanting to recreate the Cambodja Empire

That's because i stand corrected - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

I literally gave you sounces about his plans and invasion in vietnam, you are wrong

I admitted that I was wrong. That's what "I stand corrected" means, buddy. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC) Oh, sorry, english isnt my main language

Other questions

You are the person who is taking behring from social darwinism page?

He is not a Social Darwinist, as he supports regulated capitalism. True Social Darwinists would not support regulations. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 16:00, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

A lot of social darwinists (like Hitler) arent economic social darwinists, he is a etnic and social social darwinist(he killed the sons of the leftists politicians because he think that They had "traitor genes") the page itself recognize this and have social darwinism has a non quadrant off Compass ideology with Pekka-Eric being a nazbol social darwinist The economic laize fairre social darwinism is a subideology named "spercenism"

I moved Pekka to National Bolshevism because he just called himself a social darwinist because he was inspired by the Columbine shooters. Also, "ethnic social darwinism" doesn't exist, as believing that a certain race/ethnicity is superior contradicts social darwinism. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

This is your personal opinion all sounces and the Wiki itself is against you vision, so stop making edit wars for your personal beliefs

How is this my personal opinion? It's a fact that Pekka was just LARPing and that you cannot support regulated capitalism and be a social darwinist. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Pekka Eric ideology ia entire about social darwinism and misantropy and him only suports national bolchevism because Hitler and starlin killed a lot os people being "social cleaners like him" and all sounces, popular sense and the wiki itself says "not all social darwinists are economic laize fairre social darwinists"

He was active in both far-left and far-right movements, thus making him a nazbol. He was just inspired by the Columbine shooters, that's why he called himself a social darwinist. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 16:46, 22 March 2025 (UTC) Whats your problem about ignore my entire point?

I moved him back, so stop fucking yapping. - BookchinFan69420 (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2025 (UTC)