User:BookchinFan69420

From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


Beliefs

Foreign Policy

  • Palestine: I support Palestine over Israel. Israel is a genocidal and illegitimate apartheid state. I support the establishment of a secular, socialist, and democratic Palestinian state. I don't support Hamas, as I oppose the homophobic reactionaryism promoted by the group. I prefer the PFLP.
  • Ukraine: I support Ukraine over Russia. Russia is an authoritarian bourgeois dictatorship that represses LGBTQ people. Also, Russia has committed war crimes in Ukraine such as the Bucha massacre and kidnappings of children. I obviously don't support Zelensky's repression of trade unions, but I support the Ukranian people in their struggle in resistance against Russian oppression.

Userboxes

This user is Socialist

"The proletariat is united!"


This user is a Progressive.

"FORWARD, FORWARD!"


This user is Environmentalist.

"Save the trees or I'll break both your knees!"


This user is Syndicalist

"There is power in a union!"



Different versions of my ideology

Alternative History

What if Trump chose X as his VP instead of JD Vance?

Tom Cotton

It's July 15th, 2024, the first day of the Republican National Convention. Trump is expected to announce who he has picked as his running mate. Suddenly, it turns out that Donald Trump has picked Tom Cotton as his running mate.

Trump would immediately lose support from paleoconservative voters, due to Cotton's neoconservative views. However, Trump would surge in popularity among neoconservatives that now thought that Trump would be better on foreign policy. Trump would probably win due to an "United front" of conservatives, as Cotton's selections would draw Moderate Republicans that have hawkish views, alongside some Kinzingerist liberal hawks.

Elise Stefanik

It is July 15th 2024. Just before the beginning of the Republican National Convention, Trump announces that he has chosen Elise Stefanik as his running mate.

Trump would gain a surge in LGBTQ conservative voters due to Stefanik's surprising support of same-sex marriage. Other than that, it's hard to say whether if Trump would lose or win in this scenario.

Ron DeSantis

On July 15th, 2024, Trump announces that he has picked Ron DeSantis to be his running mate. This would result in him forefitting the state of Florida's electoral votes due to the 12th amendment.

This would motivate progressives to support Democrats more due to DeSantis's anti-LGBT stances. Meanwhile, DeSantis supporters would move to support Trump.

Trump would probably lose in this scenario due to increased left-wing support for Democrats, and due to moderates being turned off by DeSantis.

Alternative Presidential runoffs

RFK JR vs Donald Trump

After Joe Biden drops out on July 21st, 2024, Biden would not give an endorsement to Harris as expected. After this, Robert F. Kennedy Jr re-enters the Democratic primaries in order to be a candidate at the DNC.

This is part of a plan by Kennedy to stage a convention coup at the DNC through manipulating votes by having his supporters be delegates (and protests at the DNC). He would also try to get delegates to pledge votes to him via allegations of election fraud in the primaries.

This coup would eventually be successfull, and on August 19th, 2024, Robert F Kennedy Jr is confirmed as the Democratic presidential nominee for the November general election.

Independent and moderate voters would be attracted by this new change, happy that, in their eyes, the Democrats have been pushed more to the center. However, some black voters would be disappointed that Kamala Harris wasn't the candidate, and that she was cheated out of the nomination.

However, the union of centrists and most of the Democratic voting base basically being forced to rally around RFK JR would end up in a victory in the end.

Marianne Williamson vs Tom Cotton

This would happen in a scenario where Donald Trump's sentencing went on as normal, and he was imprisoned and is forced to drop out only 4 days before the RNC. Trump has already chosen his VP in this scenario, and it's Tom Cotton. Trump voters quickly get behind Cotton and he picks Doug Burgum as his VP.

This would also happen in a scenario where Biden doesn't drop out, but would end up being replaced as the nominee otherwise. Shortly before the DNC, Biden and Harris are both assassinated. America and the entire world are shocked.

It's the first day of the DNC, and Democrats are wondering who will they pick as a replacement nominee, and they would pick Marianne Williamson, as they would see here as the second-most popular.

Williamson would regain the left-wing vote, and attract black voters due to her stances on reparations. She would probably take the smart road and blame the deaths of Biden and Harris on Republican rhetoric, gaining sympathy votes.

Meanwhile, Cotton would weaponise Trump's imprisonment in the same manner, and try to attrach orthodox Trump voters (Especially the paleoconservative minority) by saying that Trump selected him to be his replacement/heir after he was arrested due by the Deep State or something. (This would only attract right-leaning sympathy voters and Tulsist independents) Cotton's stances on Israel and Ukraine would attract many liberal hawks.

Although the election would be close, Williamson would probably manage to edge out Cotton in this scenario due to sympathy votes. However, with Mike Johnson as acting president, attempts to overturn the election would be more widespread. Due to the close results in swing states, and legal challenges to the results, Cotton probably would be able to pull off a Bush vs Gore in this scenario.

Micheal Flynn vs Dean Philips

The assassination attempt doesn't happen in this scenario, since it would be unrealistic that Flynn would even be motivated to do it then. Anyways, in the days before the RNC, Donald Trump would announce that he has picked Nikki Haley as his running mate.

This would piss off most of Trump's voting base, as Trump was the person who rilled them against Haley. Protests would be planned at the RNC. Micheal Flynn would use the help of QAnon in order to launch a convention coup against Trump by hijacking the delegates of states. This would be successful. Flynn picks Lauren Boebert as his VP, due to her ties to QAnon.

A few days later, Joe Biden would drop out, and give a surprising endorsement to Dean Philips instead of Kamala Harris. All of Biden's supporters would rush to support Philps's campaign, and he would quickly gain the support of states that would pledge delegates to him. He picks Tim Walz as his VP.

Eventually, Philips is confirmed as the nominee. Realistically, Philips would beat Flynn in a reverse 1984.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vs Nikki Haley

This would happen in 2028, when AOC would be old enough to run. This would also happen in a scenario where Kamala wins 2024, but gets assassinated during her term.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announces that she is running in the Democratic primary in 2027, quickly gaining the support of progressives and the left. She would also gain the support of the Squad. AOC quickly gains Kamala's former supporters, and proceeds to wipe the floor with her primary opponents.

Trump dies in this scenario, and there is a power struggle in the Republican party for who will be his heir. Eventually, with the intervention of donors, Nikki Haley becomes the nominee after a scuffed primary.

Unlike the Cotton vs Williamson scenario, Haley wouldn't be able to use Trump's death like how Cotton used Trump's imprisonment, as he wasn't assassinated. However, AOC would definitely use Kamala's assassination in campaign ads. Also, Haley doesn't have the same charisma as Trump, and it would be hard gaining some of Trump's populist supporters.

Due to Haley's unpopularity, AOC would probably able to beat her in this scenario.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vs Doug Mastriano

First, here is how the two nominees well, became the nominees.

  • Mastriano: Mastriano would run in the primary, but not win any states. In this primary, he would strategically and temporarily drop his pro-Isreal stance in order to gain support from Alt-Right voters. During the RNC, Mastriano would use this newly gained voterbase to launch a convention coup against Trump.

Mastriano would claim that Trump is a traitor to the true traditionalist values of the Republican party, and with backing from protests from fringe right-wing groups, would be able to successfully launch a convention coup against one of the people that supported him the most.

Mastriano's campaign would gain support from the far-right of the Republican party, but would cause moderate median voters to think that the Republican party was becoming too radical and far-right.

  • Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: In this scenario, Biden would drop out as usual, but instead of Kamala Harris being immediately endorsed by him, he would back the idea of a mini primary that was itself backed by multiple other prominent Democratic leaders. Eventually, AOC would win the primary after a few races, and be officially declared as the Democratic Presidential Nominee at the DNC.

Realistically, Mastriano would be defeated due to his support only coming from fringe Alt-Right groups, and due to the Republican voterbase being disappointed due to him launching the convention coup against Trump.

What if Harris and Trump swapped places?

Explained

In this scenario, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump swap places. Which means that Harris is president from 2017 to 2021, due to her being defeated by Trump in 2020.

Scenario

In this scenario, Nikki Haley takes the place of Hilary Clinton, and is defeated by Harris in 2016. Fringe left-wing groups would rally around Harris, especially on the internet. Just reverse the policies that were carried out under Trump, and you would get what would happen under the Harris presidency.

2020 comes, and this time, Ron DeSantis takes the place of Bernie Sanders. DeSantis begins winning states in the primaries, but Donald Trump summons the power of the RNC in order to get the other candidates to drop out, making DeSantis the frontrunner as Trump proceeds to sweep the Super Tuesday races.

What if the Democratic and Republican parties collapsed?

Parties

Split from the Democrats

Split From The Republicans

More info about each party

New Liberal Party

The New Liberal Party is the main offshoot of the defunct Democratic Party. Created by Kamala Harris in 2022, the party claims to bring about a resurgence in progressive and liberal politics in the United States. The party believes in economic liberalism, social liberalism, and third-way politics. It is the biggest of the Democratic split off parties.


Liberty And Democracy

The Liberty And Democracy party, founded in 2023 by Chase Oliver, is a party focused on promoting what it sees as "true libertarianism". The party platform states: " The LD is a political party founded on the basis of protecting civil liberties for all peoples. The LD is an progressive alternative to the ultraconservative LA, and a libertarian alternative to the NLP." The party's political policies are:

The political party was founded by Oliver as a result of factions from the collapsed Democratic Party merging with factions of the Libertarian Party that became dissatisfied with its growing social conservatism.

Progressive Alternative

Another split off from the Democratic party is the Progressive Alternative party. Founded in 2022 by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the party presents itself as a more progressive version of the NLP. The party is founded opon the principles of democratic socialism and social progressivism. The party's political policies are:

In April 2022, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized the Biden administration for not enacting enough progressive polices. This would cause the more left-wing factions of the Democratic Party to become detached from the rest of the Democrats.

In July 2022, after the overturning of Roe v Wade, AOC would announce that she was leaving the Democratic Party due to the administrations failure to save it, among other failures to insure progressive policy. Following this, most of the Squad members would join her in leaving the party. Later that month, AOC, alongside the Squad, would found the Progressive Alternative party.


Libertarians For The Nation

The Libertarians For The Nation party is a political party founded by Charlie Kirk in 2022. The party launched in mid-January with a large campaign rally, and soon held multiple events in the weeks after. Anarcho-Captialists would later start joining the party, as they saw it as a new front for libertarian views.

At first, paleolibertarians were dissatisfied with the neo-libertarianism of the LFTN, and refused to join it. However, Rob Paul made positive comments about the party in a incident that sparked conflict within the anti-LFTN libertarian movement.

Alt-right libertarians would be appeased by the LFTN's anti-immigrant stances, and would think that they would be able to convince the LFTN to adopt white supremacist ideals, and the Liberty and Identity caucus would be founded, and would proclaim itself on promoting European identity and promoting " nationalist libertarianism" within the party. Due to this, the LFTN would gain large backlash due to letting the caucus exist.

This would later lead to the creation of the Liberty and Democracy party in April, as libertarian factions of the Democratic party had already become dissatisfied with its policies. The LAD took the opportunity to position itself as a truly progressive libertarian front and gain more popularity among progressives.

In May 2022, Rand Paul would join the LFTN and found the LA caucus in a move that accelerated the popularity of the LFTN. This would cause the LFTN to become the largest party of the Republican split offs, before the ANP would be founded later that year.

Libertarian Alternative

The Libertarian Alternative is an informal name for a caucus within the LFTN party. It was founded by Ron Paul in May 2022 after he controversially joined the party. He justified his decision by saying that the LFTN is a front for libertarian views, no matter views on foreign policy. His caucus's website stated that it's pirciples are to "promote the right to life, liberty, and property, within the Libertarians For The Nation party." The LA's stated political policies are:

Party For The Republic

The Party For The Republic party is a political party founded by Mike Pence in 2023. The party's political platform states: "The Party For The Republic is a party founded on the principle of preserving America's traditions and cultural values and promoting patriotism throughout the country." On political stances, the PFTR is slightly more moderate than the ANP on certain issues. The party advocates for the following political policies:

Reclaim America Front

The Reclaim America Front is a far-right party founded as a splinter off of the Republican Party. It was founded in 2024 by Micheal Flynn. The RAF is commonly criticized for its alt-right and white supremacist factions. The RAF is built opon the principles of preserving American traditional values and culture. The RAF advocates for the following policies:

American National Party

The American National Party, founded in 2023 by Ron DeSantis, is the main split off from the Republican Party. Members and leaders within the party include Marco Rubio, Vivek Ramswamy, and JD Vance. The party's ideology is a mixture of Neoconservatism and Right-Wing Populism.

What if Otzma Yehudit won a hypothetical 2024 Israeli election?

Scenario

It is September 2024. The 2024 Israeli legislative elections are being held following the resignation of Benjamin Netanyahu. Results are released, and the Kahanist political party Otzma Yehudit has a majority. Otzma Yehudit would take power the next month.

The government, led by Itamar Ben-Gvir, would immediately begin mass deportations of people considered "enemies of Israel". This would include some Arab citizens. The government would also annex the West Bank, and attempt to crack down on partisans.

In October of 2024, Ben-Gvir-controlled Israel would launch a invasion into southern Lebanon, gaining international condemnation. Multiple countries such as the United Kingdom, would cut aid to Israel. During this time, settler violence would increase, with setter militias now being funded by the government.

Israel would use the majority of its air power to initiate air strikes on Lebanon. However, due to the IDFs newly established "no mercy" policy against ememies, most of these strikes would end up hitting civilians instead of Hezbollah. This would cause Hezbollah to rile up the Lebanese population against Israel, and promote unification. This would cause most anti-Hezbollah groups within Lebanon into two sides:

  • Ones that kept their anti-Hezbollah stance, but still agree that the Israeli invasion needs to be combatted
  • Ones that sided with Israel.

Meanwhile, in Israeli-occupied Palestine, although with increased violence by settlers in the annexed West Bank driven by the jingoistic tendencies of the Ben-Givir government, a similar thing that happened to opposition groups in Lebanon happens here, with groups in the West Bank agreeing no matter their opinion on Hamas is, the Israeli violence needed to be stopped.

Due to the afomentioned focus on civilian targets, Hezbollah's military power would definitely be weakened, but not to the point of demilitarization. Meanwhile, Israel would eventually declare victory in Gaza, claiming that they achieved their goals of making sure that Hamas could never repeat October 7th, and withdraw troops from Gaza in order to focus on Lebanon. This influx of troops and military force would cause Hezbollah to lose ground.

Israel, despite being the side that was winning at this point of the war, would end up using too much weaponry in the war. Most military commanders in Israel would somewhat disagree with Ben-Gvirs war strategy, advising him to think of the war in a strategic way, and to focus on Hezbollah military targets such as arms depots and military bases.

Iran would give several anti-air weapons to Hezbollah in early December 2024, causing major Israeli air losses. In response, Ben-Gvir would order a large-scale air attack on Iran, that would be carried out days later.

In the attack, Israel would attempt to strike Iranian air defenses, but with only partial success. Israel would then inact air strikes on Iranian civilian infrastructure, killing dozens. Although only one Israeli jet was shot down, the attack would result in more civilian casualties than military casualties for Iran, and would further expend Israeli miltary strength. Meanwhile, in Lebanon, Israel is on the offensive in Lebanon, trying to secure Southern Lebanon. However, partisans have been heavily damaging Israeli supply lines, and Israel would have to use force to try to root them out.

As a result, Hezbollah, with partisan assistance, would launch a counteroffensive. At first, the map would stay the same, with Hezbollah not finding a spot to break through the Israeli defense lines. However, Hezbollah would use missile fire to attack Israeli forces in Lebanon and Israel, and with low Iron Dome funding, these strikes would cause damage and eventually cause Israeli lines to break.

In this battle, the IDF would try to retreat strategically to lure Hezbollah into a salient so it's forces would be encircled. However, with heavy missile fire, Israeli attempts to encircled Hezbollah would prove futile. Eventually, Iran would respond to the afomentioned strike with an attack on Israeli air bases with missiles. Due to a weakened Iron Dome, some of the missiles would hit, damaging the already depleted Israeli Air Force.

In conclusion, the IDF would probably manage to achieve a pyrrhic victory due to being more of an military force than Hezbollah. However, resistance to an Israeli military occupation of Lebanon would be quite extensive due to the populations untied stance against the invasion.

Foreign reactions
United States

At first, the US would not react to the Kahanist government taking power. However, the US government would condemn the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and would eventually cut American aid to Israel. The Republican Party would protest this decision, advocating for aid to be continued. This would lead to the Republican voting base being extremely split, and thus, Kamala Harris would beat Trump in a 1964 like victory.

United Kingdom

The UK would cut aid immediately after the Lebanon invasion. The UK would work to establish a multi-country arms embargo until Ben-Gvir decides to withdraw from Lebanon.

What if the LDPR won the 2018 elections in Russia?

Note: This occurs in the 2018 elections due to the fact that Zhirinovsky would still be alive in this scenario for the sake of it being more interesting.

On March 18th, 2018, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, somehow wins the presidential election in Russia with 65% of the vote.

Zhirinovsky would heavily centralize Russian government power in order to establish a autocratic dictatorial system. Political repression would be doubled, with leaders of opposition parties being arrested or even killed. Zhirinovsky would presumably begin a campaign of mass conscription in order to increase the size of Russia's military.

Under Zhirinovsky's leadership, Russia would adopt a imperialist foreign policy in order to restablish the Russian Empire. Russia would probably begin an invasion of the Baltic states first to achieve Zhirinovsky's long aspirations of annexing the region. The Baltic's would have NATO forces on their side, which would cause a major war to break out.

For the sake of this scenario not ending instantly with a nuclear war, let's take the fact that both nations have nukes out of this for now. Russia would probably be able to hastily temporarily conquer the Baltics before NATO forces would launch a counteroffensive on the ground from Poland. With airstrikes, NATO troops enter the territory of the Baltics and turn it into contested territory. The war insures, killing thousands of troops on both sides.

In anger, and still wanting to achieve irredentist aspirations, Russia would launch a full-force invasion of Ukraine. Russian troops would be able to capture a decent amount of Ukraine's territory. However, NATO would enter the front in an attempt to somehow cut off and encircle Russian troops in the Baltics. NATO troops would join Ukranian troops in Lviv and quickly attack Russian lines.

After some battling (and of course, airstrikes), Russian lines would break, allowing NATO to advance throughout the Potlava and Kharkiv regions in an attempt to reach beyond the Russian border. Russian troops would give a quite good fight, as the Russian government would not want Russian territory to be invaded.

During this time, the Russian government would attempt to recruit soldiers from occupied territories. Also, they would drive up jingoistic rhetoric in mainland Russia, resulting in many civilians volunteering to join the war. This causes a surge of troops which caused Russia to be able to push back NATO troops.

This causes NATO to launch massive airstrikes on Russian territory in order to weaken Russian troops. They succeed, and Russian troops are forced to pull back and give up their recent gains. This is probably where the Russian government would snap and release nuclear weapons. The end.

American Civil War

Factions

Scenario

In this scenario, the United States falls into civil war due to the results of the 2020 election. Trump had since turned the US into a authoritarian state and used the BLM protests as justification. This, combined with MAGA being angry over Trump having lost the election, culminates in civil conflict.

Ideology tests that I have taken

What [insert thing] is closest to my ideology?

Ideologies that are closest to my political beliefs

Ideologies in quadrants

Other categories

Organizations that I support

Things that I have done/plan to do on this wiki

Pages that I am working on

  • Right-Wing Populism - Adding more variants to the page.
  • Alt-Right - Plan to add more variants based opon the international Alt-Right movement (eg:Romanian Alt-Right, French Alt-Right)
  • Radical Environmentalism - Expanding the history sections. I'll create a personality section and develop the relations section after I'm fully done with that.
  • Jingoism - Currently expanding theorists section and planning to add an history section. (Although that might be hard since this is a more general ideology iykwim)

Pages that I plan to work on

Pages that I have worked on

  • Black Anarchism - I am proud of the work that I did on this page. I expanded the relations, added a beliefs section, and developed the history and variants section.

Variants that I have added

In alphabetic order

Variants that I have moved

Icons that I have made

  • Conservapedia.png
  • JapanAltRight.png
  • LesNationalistes.png
  • Obraz.png
  • Pamyat.png
  • PolishAltr.png
  • RomanianAltr.png
  • SerbianAltr.png

My suggestions

This section is where I put my suggestions for the wiki.

Pages that should be moved to PCBA

Pages that I think should be moved to the main wiki from PCBA

  • Anti-Capitalism - This ideology is famous and has enough advocates. It would be good to have it here.
  • Anti-Communism - A similar reason to the above. This ideology has influenced many movements.
  • Authoritarian Progressivism - Why not?
  • Banderaism - How does Silver Legionism, an ideology that someone would only find after going into a rabbit hole on Wikipedia if it weren't for HOI4 or this wiki, get a main wiki page, but not this?
  • Black Conservatism - This could have many variants on it that are mixed around in other pages. For example, we could put a Tim Scott variant on the page if it were to be moved. Also, should be here because Homoconservatism is still here.
  • Pacifism - I believe that this ideology should be moved back to the main wiki, since Anarcho-Pacifism keeps being used as the replacement for Pacifism and it's annoying seeing people who are not anarchists classified as anarcho-pacifists.
  • Stalinism - Should be moved back to here for the same reason why Trotskyism is still here.

Pages that should be renamed for merged

  • Anarcho-Fascism & National Anarchism - Should both be merged, as the ideologies are literally mostly the same, and are considered and classified as the same by multiple sources. I don't know which page should stay or not.
  • Platformism - Rename it to Makhnovism or something.

Random ideologies that I created

Relationships (Ideologies)

Retrieved from "https://polcompball.wikitide.org/wiki/User:BookchinFan69420?oldid=619908"