Hoppeanism: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(→Theory of Comparative Government: Added one of Hoppe's arguments against democracy) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 49:
To Hoppe, and many other [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarians]], especially within the Austrian tradition, a monopoly doesn't imply a big participation on certain market exercised by a corporation, but when there is lack of entrepreneurial freedom to enter certain market and produce certain good or service, as we can currently see with services such as law.<br> Under this perspective, monopolies can't appear, at least by definition, on a completely free market since they're always the result of some state policy which bans the competition on a market or subsidizes competitors within certain markets.<br> Coercive monopolies are detrimental to consumers since prices tend to go up and quality tends to go down to those that could be found on a completely free market. Similarly to Rothbard, Hoppe has conjectured that if the services now provided by the government could be provided by the free market, private insurances and law agencies would provide a better protection and more peaceful disputes resolution than the ones currently under the monopoly of the state.<ref>[https://mises.org/library/idea-private-law-society The Idea of a Private Law Society] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2006).</ref><ref>[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], ch. 12 "On Government and the Private Production of Defense", by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 2001</ref>
He has also theorized in favor of secession of [[File:Urb.png]] [[Urbism|small city-states or microstates]] as being favorable to individual liberty, as a transition towards definitive privatization, which is to say, a society of private law, as Hoppe calls it, or Anarcho-Capitalism. Related to it, he's also said that a [[File:World.png]] [[Globalism|One World Government]] is the logical consequence of the existence of the state, which naturally tends towards centralization and growth, and that being a non-anarchist and also being against centralization is non-consequential (comment directed to [[File:Minarchist.png]] [[Minarchism|minarchists]] and [[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|classical
===Theory of Comparative Government===
Line 118:
*[[File:Avar.png]] [[Avaritionism]] - He doesn't believe in private property rights and he kinda scares me, but he hates the state and the left so he can't be all bad... right?
*[[File:Obj.png]] [[Objectivism]] - I mean... I seems like you care about freedom. But your ideology contradicts itself constantly, and Intellectual. Property. Is. Not. Real. Property.
*[[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism]] - You're so bland. Tone down the statism,
*[[File:Neocam.png]] [[Neocameralism]] - Idk... he hangs out with Corporatocracy too much.
*[[File:Plcn2.png]] [[Paleoconservatism]] - He used to be cool but he's gone full authoritarian in recent years. Trade restrictions? Socialized healthcare? Did FDR and Lyndon Johnson teach you nothing about the dangers of welfare?
| |||